Linear transformations that preserve immanants

On certain semigroups of transformations that preserve double direction equivalence

Let TX be the full transformation semigroups on the set X. For an equivalence E on X, let TE(X) = {α ∈ TX : ∀(x, y) ∈ E ⇔ (xα, yα) ∈ E}It is known that TE(X) is a subsemigroup of TX. In this paper, we discussthe Green's *-relations, certain *-ideal and certain Rees quotient semigroup for TE(X).

Transformations that Preserve Learnability

on certain semigroups of transformations that preserve double direction equivalence

let tx be the full transformation semigroups on the set x. for an equivalence e on x, let te(x) = {α ∈ tx : ∀(x, y) ∈ e ⇔ (xα, yα) ∈ e}it is known that te(x) is a subsemigroup of tx. in this paper, we discussthe green's *-relations, certain *-ideal and certain rees quotient semigroup for te(x).

Do Linear Transformations Preserve Fuzzy Linear Independence? Some Examples

In this paper, we examine whether basic linear transformations in R 2, such as rotations, scales, etc, preserve fuzzy linear independence. We provide some examples to the contrary. Mathematics Subject Classification: 08A72, 03E72

Linear operators that preserve some test functions

The paper centers around a pair of sequences of linear positive operators. The former has the degree of exactness one and the latter has its degree of exactness null, but, as a novelty, it reproduces the third test function of Korovkin theorem. Quantitative estimates of the rate of convergence are given in different function spaces traveling from classical approximation to approximation in abst...